About this report (#report->id ?>)

Title of the news

天災還是人禍? 環團痛批蘇花路斷就在礦區

Link to the news

https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2017-06-02/88170

Source of the problem

這是礦務局回應環團的新聞稿,要點有四: 1.坍方區雖位於礦區範圍,但非實際可供採礦之範圍。 2.鄰近地區植被完整且無人為擾動情形。 3.現存及曾經核定之礦業用地與本次坍方點有相當距離,且分屬山稜之不同坡面。 4.公路下方之廢止礦區,地勢遠低於崩塌處。

Link to fact-checks

http://www.ey.gov.tw/UnitRSS_Content.aspx?n=8092BD84714005C0&s=08A292FF598B0AEF

Something wrong with this report.I want to help with editing!
Friendly reminder: every modification is recorded, including the modifier's IP address If this news article has been removed or edited, please do not delete this reporting; simply append "Updated" in the end, so that people won't still share it unknowingly on social media.

討論

Detailed edit history

Timestamp Edited by previous value updated value
2017-06-07T14:53:10+08:00 IP: 182.235.216.164
rewind this version
id
5180
created at
189天前
edit time
189天前
deleted at
Title of the news
天災還是人禍? 環團痛批蘇花路斷就在礦區
Link to the news
news_link_unique
link to the fact-checks
Source of the problem
這是礦務局回應環團的新聞稿,要點有四: 1.坍方區雖位於礦區範圍,但非實際可供採礦之範圍。 2.鄰近地區植被完整且無人為擾動情形。 3.現存及曾經核定之礦業用地與本次坍方點有相當距離,且分屬山稜之不同坡面。 4.公路下方之廢止礦區,地勢遠低於崩塌處。